Smite Neutrals
Moderators: Active DMs, Forum Moderators, Contributors
Re: Smite Neutrals
At risk of derailing my own thread, I believe Wytchee has no strong feeling on this either way.
SMITE HER!
(...for only 50% damage)
SMITE HER!
(...for only 50% damage)
The GrumpyCat wrote:I CLICK THE HOSTIBLE BUTTON NOW U ARE DED!
Irongron wrote:The slaughter, i am afraid, will not abate.
-
- Posts: 1589
- Joined: Fri Oct 06, 2017 5:20 am
Re: Smite Neutrals
This is actually a good point.BegoneThoth wrote:You would get 50% ab too right?
Though, I think we needs make it more technical. A 50% AB cut by itself is wildly subject to misinterpretation, and I hope not what you meant.
In SMITE EVIL, "The character applies their charisma modifier to their attack roll." I would totally be in favor of this applying half the cha modifier to attack rolls for neutrals. Thus, institute only a 50% AB bonus against neutrals. I assume this is what you meant.
A funny subtext of this thread for me, personally, is that I currently play no paladins. My most gratuitous class choice is druid. I'm with Wytchee in the smitee category.
The GrumpyCat wrote:I CLICK THE HOSTIBLE BUTTON NOW U ARE DED!
Irongron wrote:The slaughter, i am afraid, will not abate.
-
- Posts: 110
- Joined: Sun Sep 06, 2015 8:17 pm
- Location: Arizona.
Re: Smite Neutrals
This is one of the best things ive read on this forum ... Jack you just made my day
Jack Oat wrote: This is akin to telling a PnP DM they can't tell a Paladin how to play their Lawful Good alignment because they can't understand the whole of that alignment. Yes you can.
"Good" is "I do things that help other people at my own cost."
Evil is "I do things that help me or my desires at the cost of others."
Neutral is "I do nice things. Sometimes. Not really often, usually only when it suits me. I don't really do evil stuff though, isn't my place to take peoples' stuff away or what not."
Lawful is "I abide a code or set of principles because without that I feel lost amidst an ocean of nonsense."
Chaos is "idk fam I do what I want without much concern for a code or what not."
So when you run across Slaver McMurderHobo goes "hey i dont like elfs n i wanna go 2 war with them cus i can and lol slaves" you can go "Hm. This guy doesn't really seem to have a code (chaotic) and is doing stuff for personal gain at the cost of others (evil)."
Last edited by Rivace_Silver on Wed Nov 15, 2017 10:14 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-That one time that Stath did that one thing and it was funny...
-We cannot all be the hero, some have to be the normal folk who make others heros..
- we are all the protagonist of our own stories.
-We cannot all be the hero, some have to be the normal folk who make others heros..
- we are all the protagonist of our own stories.
-
- Posts: 110
- Joined: Sun Sep 06, 2015 8:17 pm
- Location: Arizona.
Re: Smite Neutrals
Seven Sons of Sin wrote:Just include CN in Smite Evil. It's a stupid alignment anyways, for the reasons described above.
players playing the alignment wrong, does not make it stupid, it makes those players incapable of playing an alignment and the dm's should be able to (even if they choose not to) handle that particular issue.
I happen to like CN and it can be played correctly. I believe there was a in depth discussion in another thread which went into great detail what is and is not acceptable CN rp. there are several players who play it wonderfully.
-That one time that Stath did that one thing and it was funny...
-We cannot all be the hero, some have to be the normal folk who make others heros..
- we are all the protagonist of our own stories.
-We cannot all be the hero, some have to be the normal folk who make others heros..
- we are all the protagonist of our own stories.
-
- Posts: 1139
- Joined: Sat Mar 18, 2017 7:09 am
Re: Smite Neutrals
If you don't think TN would be the new CN the moment smite evil started hitting chaotic you don't know the people that play here very well.
Clerics are just socially acceptable warlocks.The devil does not need any more advocates
-
- Posts: 2187
- Joined: Mon Sep 08, 2014 3:40 am
Re: Smite Neutrals
It often begs the question if we should abolish Arelith's alignment system, in favour of delineating mechanics based on the pre-existing deity system. I.e. "Smite worshipper of Evil God" has always seemed more appropriate than "Smite NE thug."One Two Three Five wrote:If you don't think TN would be the new CN the moment smite evil started hitting chaotic you don't know the people that play here very well.
Previous:
Oskarr of Procampur, Ro Irokon, Nahal Azyen, Nelehein Afsana (of Impiltur), Vencenti Medici, Nizram ali Balazdam, (Roznik) Naethandreil
Oskarr of Procampur, Ro Irokon, Nahal Azyen, Nelehein Afsana (of Impiltur), Vencenti Medici, Nizram ali Balazdam, (Roznik) Naethandreil
-
- Posts: 901
- Joined: Wed Oct 08, 2014 9:06 am
- Location: Australia
Re: Smite Neutrals
I vote no on all of this. People should just play their alignments properly, and not cheese it for mechanical advantage. See something very wrong, just report it.
Every time a paladin murders an innocent ..
.. Nothing happens. It's totally okay to murder innocent people, as long as you think they should be evil.
"Just remember, it's not a lie if you believe it." - George Costanza
That was sarcasm, it's totally not okay. Bad.
Every time a paladin murders an innocent ..
.. Nothing happens. It's totally okay to murder innocent people, as long as you think they should be evil.
"Just remember, it's not a lie if you believe it." - George Costanza
That was sarcasm, it's totally not okay. Bad.
Characters: Xun'sali (ACTIVE), Tianae Tymeaneldth (Rolled), Sylali (Rolled), Magpie (Rolled), Ker'uanna Tymeaneldth (Rolled), Lepota Poklona (Rolled), Andariel Bloodletter (Shelved), Tahl'tril Cyredrretyn (Rolled), L'omithiel (Shelved).
Re: Smite Neutrals
Evil aligments will immidiatly multiply if "I kill majority of evil builds with 2 strikes after I spent 100xp" will be tuned to +10-20 flat constant damage vs evil or etc or etc;
-> Meaning paladin will have a significant advantage but can be fight off without the lady of luck involved, at least unless Beshaba desided to say hi yet another time.
No I didn't say paladin can't be fight off as is if one is evil. Still.
And no, this isn't a nerf request, smaller constant buff is better, imho, then three time wonder per rest ).
P.C Smite neutral, eee...I smite you you tree hugger?..
Heh.."your neutral opinion on this matter irritates me to no end and I will end you now, because the Lady is on my side!"
Sounds bad even for someone like me :p.
Many players play neutral because it gives flexibility to one's words, without limiting one to one constant style of play.
-> Meaning paladin will have a significant advantage but can be fight off without the lady of luck involved, at least unless Beshaba desided to say hi yet another time.
No I didn't say paladin can't be fight off as is if one is evil. Still.
And no, this isn't a nerf request, smaller constant buff is better, imho, then three time wonder per rest ).
P.C Smite neutral, eee...I smite you you tree hugger?..
Heh.."your neutral opinion on this matter irritates me to no end and I will end you now, because the Lady is on my side!"
Sounds bad even for someone like me :p.
Many players play neutral because it gives flexibility to one's words, without limiting one to one constant style of play.
-
- Arelith Silver Supporter
- Posts: 1599
- Joined: Sun Jul 12, 2015 8:43 pm
Re: Smite Neutrals
I'm all in favor of making Smite Evil/Good work on Neutrals.
That said, it wouldn't hurt if Smite Evil/Good also worked with Ranged weapons.
That said, it wouldn't hurt if Smite Evil/Good also worked with Ranged weapons.
Re: Smite Neutrals
Never thought of this. Love it!MissEvelyn wrote:I'm all in favor of making Smite Evil/Good work on Neutrals.
That said, it wouldn't hurt if Smite Evil/Good also worked with Ranged weapons.
The GrumpyCat wrote:I CLICK THE HOSTIBLE BUTTON NOW U ARE DED!
Irongron wrote:The slaughter, i am afraid, will not abate.
-
- Posts: 191
- Joined: Fri Nov 28, 2014 9:29 am
- Location: astral projecting
Re: Smite Neutrals
honestly it sounds more like a DM issue than a mechanical issue... making smite work on opposing alignment and neutral is about as cheesy as that true neutral lich that was in place to avoid effects of pfa
it just kinda feels like its going against the spirit of DnD
if a pc’s rp doesnt coincide with their chosen align an align change seems suitable enough doesnt it?
idk
it just kinda feels like its going against the spirit of DnD
if a pc’s rp doesnt coincide with their chosen align an align change seems suitable enough doesnt it?
idk
"You have died...Your corpse has been picked up...Your corpse has been dropped..Player you thought was your ally has left the group."
(the ultimate betrayl..)
(the ultimate betrayl..)
Re: Smite Neutrals
viewtopic.php?f=15&p=128123#p128123
Turns out that entitled millennial paladins have no other choice but to continue revelling in their impotence. Deal with it
Now if we could kindly move on and cease these cheesy attempts to ask for undeserved point-clicky autowin buttons being handed over for no tradeoff whatsoever, that would be nice.
Turns out that entitled millennial paladins have no other choice but to continue revelling in their impotence. Deal with it
Now if we could kindly move on and cease these cheesy attempts to ask for undeserved point-clicky autowin buttons being handed over for no tradeoff whatsoever, that would be nice.
Re: Smite Neutrals
Smite neutral would make zero sense. Hope it will never be implemented.
"Your lack of feeling toward one way or the other is literally as disgusting as fiends and other atrocities, i shall smite thee for some weird reason, because evidently I'm a paladin, and i really like cheese!"
"Your lack of feeling toward one way or the other is literally as disgusting as fiends and other atrocities, i shall smite thee for some weird reason, because evidently I'm a paladin, and i really like cheese!"
-
- Contributor
- Posts: 2971
- Joined: Thu Jun 11, 2015 2:31 am
- Location: Dancing on the line between sarcasm and irony
Re: Smite Neutrals
Apathy is not the only form of neutrality.Xanos950 wrote:Smite neutral would make zero sense. Hope it will never be implemented.
"Your lack of feeling toward one way or the other is literally as disgusting as fiends and other atrocities, i shall smite thee for some weird reason, because evidently I'm a paladin, and i really like cheese!"
Misc Changes, with the Feats and Skills sublinks.
Available races
Spell Changes
Class Mechanics
Command Guide
Take a look before asking your questions!
Available races
Spell Changes
Class Mechanics
Command Guide
Take a look before asking your questions!
-
- Arelith Silver Supporter
- Posts: 1599
- Joined: Sun Jul 12, 2015 8:43 pm
Re: Smite Neutrals
Both extremely good and extremely evil people find apathy annoying and distasteful. Some of them might even describe apathetic people as a waste of air.
There's plenty of RP justification as to why Smite should at least partially work on neutrals.
There's plenty of RP justification as to why Smite should at least partially work on neutrals.
Re: Smite Neutrals
The ability isn't Smite Annoyance. It's for smiting your opponent in a war between cosmic forces.
For an example, an infernalist blackguard would certainly like to kill an abyssal, but they can't do it with smite (unless we add Smite chaotic and Smite lawful).
For an example, an infernalist blackguard would certainly like to kill an abyssal, but they can't do it with smite (unless we add Smite chaotic and Smite lawful).
-
- Posts: 1139
- Joined: Sat Mar 18, 2017 7:09 am
Re: Smite Neutrals
Imagine being a paladin of Ilmater, god of suffering and mercy, and seeing someone who's just, like, a merchant and doesn't want to get involved in an epic struggle between good and evil-
And getting so mad that you murder him with divine magic.
Imagine staying a paladin. I say imagine, because you wouldn't. Not that this matters because it's hardcoded unless the EE says otherwise.
And getting so mad that you murder him with divine magic.
Imagine staying a paladin. I say imagine, because you wouldn't. Not that this matters because it's hardcoded unless the EE says otherwise.
Clerics are just socially acceptable warlocks.The devil does not need any more advocates
Re: Smite Neutrals
I mean.. if you give extremes the ability to smite neutral are you going to give neutrals the ability to smite extremes? A druid can be extremely passionate about "the balance" brand of neutrality for example, as weird as passion about neutrality could sound. And most animals are neutral not because of apathy but lack of the concept of morality to begin with, that's a thing to smite?
Everything doesn't need a counter, it's okay if some abilities, classes, alignments what have you are a bit lopsided. Smite is such a niche ability you can be a good/evil character and never get "smitten" anyway.
I would say though, law vs chaos smiting might be interesting, perhaps for divine champions, paladins and BGs depending on deity?
Everything doesn't need a counter, it's okay if some abilities, classes, alignments what have you are a bit lopsided. Smite is such a niche ability you can be a good/evil character and never get "smitten" anyway.
I would say though, law vs chaos smiting might be interesting, perhaps for divine champions, paladins and BGs depending on deity?
-
- Arelith Silver Supporter
- Posts: 152
- Joined: Thu Nov 24, 2016 11:21 pm
Re: Smite Neutrals
Make smite work on neutrals (and good), but have it give evil points to the paladin on hit.
That which doesn't kill you, simply makes you... stranger.
-
- Arelith Silver Supporter
- Posts: 626
- Joined: Wed Mar 02, 2016 1:56 am
Re: Smite Neutrals
This is a feat everyone wants.Lorkas wrote:Smite Annoyance.
Re: Smite Neutrals
How about just removing paladins/blackguards as a class altogether. Personally, I find the entire concept of a "divine champion" kind of dumb and extremely immersion breaking.
-
- Arelith Platinum Supporter
- Posts: 343
- Joined: Mon Sep 08, 2014 5:57 am
Re: Smite Neutrals
Using smite today, It would be nice if it came with a small visual effect.
On the day Arelith moves to haks, or if EE hardcodes it, another idea I had was to have smite do more damage the further away in alignment your oppponent was, with a flat 0 if they were the same alignment.
On the day Arelith moves to haks, or if EE hardcodes it, another idea I had was to have smite do more damage the further away in alignment your oppponent was, with a flat 0 if they were the same alignment.