Which resources should be adjusted in terms of value?
Moderators: Forum Moderators, Active DMs, Contributors
-
- Posts: 133
- Joined: Fri Sep 20, 2019 1:58 pm
Which resources should be adjusted in terms of value?
Marble is what specifically made me want to ask you guys for your thoughts - marble is harder to find deposits of, and it seems to be about a third as often to mine from a deposit compared to granite.
Yet they are worth the same gold and resource points when selling/donating to a settlement.
This feels sort of lame, and I'm thinking that multiplying marble's value by 2 or 2.5 would be appropriate, or just making it less insanely annoying to mine.
Are there other resources you guys think should be adjusted like this? Do you think I'm wrong with marble?
Yet they are worth the same gold and resource points when selling/donating to a settlement.
This feels sort of lame, and I'm thinking that multiplying marble's value by 2 or 2.5 would be appropriate, or just making it less insanely annoying to mine.
Are there other resources you guys think should be adjusted like this? Do you think I'm wrong with marble?
Re: Which resources should be adjusted in terms of value?
Except granite is infinitely more useful as a building material, which should logically make it be valued higher (and thus give more resources per block to the settlement) than marble. Settlements can already manually opt to pay more for marble in the expanded warehouse, which can reflect its value to crafters. Changing the base price doesn't make a lot of sense.
As for other resources: Bricks. Bricks are a worthless item. The recipe either needs to give significantly more bricks - or the bricks need to be worth more, to make crafting them worth the time and energy it takes to gather coal and clay for this purpose (especially with the massive nerf to coalmining we've had.)
As for other resources: Bricks. Bricks are a worthless item. The recipe either needs to give significantly more bricks - or the bricks need to be worth more, to make crafting them worth the time and energy it takes to gather coal and clay for this purpose (especially with the massive nerf to coalmining we've had.)
-
- Posts: 426
- Joined: Sun Oct 21, 2018 6:45 pm
Re: Which resources should be adjusted in terms of value?
Earthkin have marble in a starting area. Difficulty to mine isn't a universal experience with the different races and settlements.
Plus for what it's worth, sometimes you think something is impossible to find then it turns out to be in a very easy to access place (though maybe out of the way, like a dungeon with no writs involved so everyone ignores it.)
Plus for what it's worth, sometimes you think something is impossible to find then it turns out to be in a very easy to access place (though maybe out of the way, like a dungeon with no writs involved so everyone ignores it.)
Re: Which resources should be adjusted in terms of value?
I'm of the inverse opinion. Gemstones are utterly useless in general construction, but they are very expensive by comparison to normal stones. Marble has historically always been less plentiful than general stone, and is used for high end construction, in tiles, columns, and the like. It features heavily in sculpting.Memelord wrote: ↑Fri Sep 27, 2019 7:32 pmExcept granite is infinitely more useful as a building material, which should logically make it be valued higher (and thus give more resources per block to the settlement) than marble. Settlements can already manually opt to pay more for marble in the expanded warehouse, which can reflect its value to crafters. Changing the base price doesn't make a lot of sense.
Additionally, granite is everywhere, and is collected twice as efficiently, besides having more nodes across the module. If anything, the law of supply and demand should dictate that granite's price should be half that of marble, as demand for both mechanically is flat, but supply is skewed.
As for the second part of your arguement, the base price needs to be changed, rather than settlement price, otherwise, a settlement is immediately victimized by economic warfare, as everyone and their mother dumps tens of thousands, if not hundreds of thousands, of units of stone into the target settlement, wiping out its bank account.
There is a very good reason almost every single settlement on the server is set at minumum pricing for all resources across the board. For a change like this to be effective, it would need to be applied 'blanket' to the entire server by altering the material's base value. Anything less will be not only ineffective, but also actively detrimental.
Plays: Durvayas(deleted), Marco(deleted), Hounynrae(NPC), Sinithra Auvry'ndal(rolled), Rauvlin Barrith(Active), Madeline Clavelle(Shelved)
-
- Posts: 133
- Joined: Fri Sep 20, 2019 1:58 pm
Re: Which resources should be adjusted in terms of value?
I *THINK* that this manner of economic warfare is no longer possible. That's what I've been told for over a year, anyway. I was informed that people used to make bronze ingots en masse and shit them into a settlement to force an election (which sounds hilarious and fun to me) but that is no longer possible.Durvayas wrote: ↑Fri Sep 27, 2019 8:43 pmI'm of the inverse opinion. Gemstones are utterly useless in general construction, but they are very expensive by comparison to normal stones. Marble has historically always been less plentiful than general stone, and is used for high end construction, in tiles, columns, and the like. It features heavily in sculpting.Memelord wrote: ↑Fri Sep 27, 2019 7:32 pmExcept granite is infinitely more useful as a building material, which should logically make it be valued higher (and thus give more resources per block to the settlement) than marble. Settlements can already manually opt to pay more for marble in the expanded warehouse, which can reflect its value to crafters. Changing the base price doesn't make a lot of sense.
Additionally, granite is everywhere, and is collected twice as efficiently, besides having more nodes across the module. If anything, the law of supply and demand should dictate that granite's price should be half that of marble, as demand for both mechanically is flat, but supply is skewed.
As for the second part of your arguement, the base price needs to be changed, rather than settlement price, otherwise, a settlement is immediately victimized by economic warfare, as everyone and their mother dumps tens of thousands, if not hundreds of thousands, of units of stone into the target settlement, wiping out its bank account.
There is a very good reason almost every single settlement on the server is set at minumum pricing for all resources across the board. For a change like this to be effective, it would need to be applied 'blanket' to the entire server by altering the material's base value. Anything less will be not only ineffective, but also actively detrimental.
Is that actually still theoretically possible?
-
- Posts: 418
- Joined: Thu Oct 18, 2018 12:12 am
Re: Which resources should be adjusted in terms of value?
Sabotaging a settlements gold reserves via market warfare isn't feasible unless the gold value in their treasury us significantly low. Like sub 1 million
When you donate resources the guy only buys them at full value until the warehouse is full. Then the price is reduced until someone moves them out if the ware house via the menus.
Even then you'd need a stupid amount of resources to drain millions of coin out of a treasury. I guess if you just sat there and made ingots everyday for weeks you could do it. But assuming like 1 ingot sold for 12 gold and then the price is reduced by half when the ware house is full. Then you only get 6 gold. Assuming the settlement has 2 million gold you'd need Thousand and thousands of ingots
When you donate resources the guy only buys them at full value until the warehouse is full. Then the price is reduced until someone moves them out if the ware house via the menus.
Even then you'd need a stupid amount of resources to drain millions of coin out of a treasury. I guess if you just sat there and made ingots everyday for weeks you could do it. But assuming like 1 ingot sold for 12 gold and then the price is reduced by half when the ware house is full. Then you only get 6 gold. Assuming the settlement has 2 million gold you'd need Thousand and thousands of ingots
I am not on a team.
I do not win, I do not lose.
I tell a story, and when I'm lucky,
Play a part in the story you tell too.
I do not win, I do not lose.
I tell a story, and when I'm lucky,
Play a part in the story you tell too.
-
- Posts: 49
- Joined: Tue Jan 22, 2019 5:43 pm
Re: Which resources should be adjusted in terms of value?
That is entirely dependent on what the settlement has its warehouse buy numbers set at as well as how much it will accept, and then also what the settlement itself offers for stone.
I /thought/ marble was paid more for from the settlement. I wonder when you sold it, did it go to the city or to the expanded warehouse?
I /thought/ marble was paid more for from the settlement. I wonder when you sold it, did it go to the city or to the expanded warehouse?
Re: Which resources should be adjusted in terms of value?
Marble is used as a high-end construction material - as a veneer. It's almost always been used historically in very small amounts, almost only ever as a finishing layer over cheaper materials (like granite, concrete, limestone or wood.) When a 'nice' white stone has been needed to be used en masse, it's traditionally the far cheaper limestone (source: I'm a classical archaeologist and I've personally dug up a hell of a lot of basalt, granite and limestone but we get a little excited whenever we dig up a thin slate of marble.) Since base price directly influences, i.e. is, the amount of unit resources generated by any single item, then base price should logically reflect which resources are of most use to a settlement while allowing for the warehouse prices to determine luxury items like marble - which is used in the crafting of high end decorations like statues and columns (again, at a 1:3 ratio with granite, suggesting that even in the crafting system it's still used like its real-world counterpart, as a veneer.)Durvayas wrote: ↑Fri Sep 27, 2019 8:43 pmI'm of the inverse opinion. Gemstones are utterly useless in general construction, but they are very expensive by comparison to normal stones. Marble has historically always been less plentiful than general stone, and is used for high end construction, in tiles, columns, and the like. It features heavily in sculpting.Memelord wrote: ↑Fri Sep 27, 2019 7:32 pmExcept granite is infinitely more useful as a building material, which should logically make it be valued higher (and thus give more resources per block to the settlement) than marble. Settlements can already manually opt to pay more for marble in the expanded warehouse, which can reflect its value to crafters. Changing the base price doesn't make a lot of sense.
Additionally, granite is everywhere, and is collected twice as efficiently, besides having more nodes across the module. If anything, the law of supply and demand should dictate that granite's price should be half that of marble, as demand for both mechanically is flat, but supply is skewed.
As for the second part of your arguement, the base price needs to be changed, rather than settlement price, otherwise, a settlement is immediately victimized by economic warfare, as everyone and their mother dumps tens of thousands, if not hundreds of thousands, of units of stone into the target settlement, wiping out its bank account.
Warehouses don't stock ingots, only raw ore, last I had known.Royal Blood wrote:When you donate resources the guy only buys them at full value until the warehouse is full. Then the price is reduced until someone moves them out if the ware house via the menus.
Even then you'd need a stupid amount of resources to drain millions of coin out of a treasury. I guess if you just sat there and made ingots everyday for weeks you could do it. But assuming like 1 ingot sold for 12 gold and then the price is reduced by half when the ware house is full. Then you only get 6 gold. Assuming the settlement has 2 million gold you'd need Thousand and thousands of ingots
If a settlement's metal price is set at 50% (and most settlements have a 1-2 decade surplus of metal, so I'd be genuinely surprised if any were set above 50%) then it'll take 6,667 ingots of bronze or brass to drain just 1,000,000 gold out of their bank. It is, suffice it to say, fairly unfeasible.