Smite Neutrals
Moderators: Active DMs, Forum Moderators, Contributors
Smite Neutrals
The GrumpyCat wrote:I CLICK THE HOSTIBLE BUTTON NOW U ARE DED!
Irongron wrote:The slaughter, i am afraid, will not abate.
-
- Project Lead
- Posts: 1445
- Joined: Fri Sep 12, 2014 2:02 am
Re: Smite Neutrals
-
- Contributor
- Posts: 2908
- Joined: Thu Jun 11, 2015 2:31 am
- Location: Dancing on the line between sarcasm and irony
Re: Smite Neutrals
Available races
Spell Changes
Class Mechanics
Command Guide
Take a look before asking your questions!
Re: Smite Neutrals
Re: Smite Neutrals
Paladin: I dunno, but my god says fiddle that guy in particular, so here I go smiting again!
Re: Smite Neutrals
Honestly there are a bunch of people who should have been evil aligned, but were mechanically something like "Chaotic Neutral" specifically to avoid being smote. They were closer to Neutral Evil, but avoided it using shenanigans to keep from being smote. I think that's the bigger issue, but that's a debate for another topic.Nitro wrote:Me: What makes a man turn neutral? Lust for gold? Power? Or were you just born with a heart full of neutrality?
Paladin: I dunno, but my god says fiddle that guy in particular, so here I go smiting again!
"You shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free."
Garrbear wrote:quite bluntly we can't balance the server around people who don't play well
Irongron wrote:My main takeaway from this is that Jack is apparently personable
-
- Posts: 26
- Joined: Wed Nov 01, 2017 8:10 pm
- Location: Sweden
Re: Smite Neutrals
The legend quoted:
https://youtu.be/k8ws_APXilE
Re: Smite Neutrals
But on a more fundamental level, I really don't like that simple alignment neutrality makes you pretty much mechanically immune to alignment based powers. To compensate for that, I'm thinking of a half-way-serious suggestion here.
Much like the protection from alignment spell which, on Arelith, invokes "half-measures" on neutrals (bah-dum-tiss): what if neutrals were say subject to 50% "smite evil" damage and 50% subject to "smite good" damage? They would still get a small benefit from their median alignment choice, but collectively, they hit the 100% mark that evil and good has to deal with. Also, unlike the protection from alignment spells, this is somewhat mediated by the fact that no single character will have both abilities.
The GrumpyCat wrote:I CLICK THE HOSTIBLE BUTTON NOW U ARE DED!
Irongron wrote:The slaughter, i am afraid, will not abate.
Re: Smite Neutrals
This isn't a bad idea at all. Going neutral to avoid smiting is commonplace.RedGiant wrote: Much like the protection from alignment spell which, on Arelith, invokes "half-measures" on neutral:
what if neutrals were say subject to 50% "smite evil" damage and 50% subject to "smite good" damage? They would still get a small benefit from their median alignment choice, but collectively, they hit the 100% mark that evil and good has to deal with. Also, unlike the protection from alignment spells, this is somewhat mediated by no single character will have both abilities.
-
- Posts: 1589
- Joined: Fri Oct 06, 2017 5:20 am
Re: Smite Neutrals
A better option might just be to bump the evil neutrals down to evil.
Re: Smite Neutrals
You make non-evil sound cutesy. Neutral is half evil!BegoneThoth wrote:Will certainty be interesting to see paladins smiting the non-evil and receiving a blessing for it. A better option might just be to bump the evil neutrals down to evil.
Also, the DM time investment to do the level of alignment management you suggest...for a server with this many character...*shudders*
Besides, this is how the protection spells already function.
The GrumpyCat wrote:I CLICK THE HOSTIBLE BUTTON NOW U ARE DED!
Irongron wrote:The slaughter, i am afraid, will not abate.
Re: Smite Neutrals
Yes, this. Paladins shouldn't get to "smite neutral", if anything they should get fallen for trying to smite someone neutral. Instead of doing this as some sort of fix for the alignment cheese, maybe enforce actually playing your alignment. Because if you don't enforce alignment there is also nothing stopping one from just being a good-aligned psychotic babykiller either, so this fixes nothing.BegoneThoth wrote:A better option might just be to bump the evil neutrals down to evil.
Lawful/chaotic is harder to spot, but DMs can shift alignment a few points if they observe good/evil acts being committed. If that changes you from neutral to evil, tough luck. If that causes your Paladin to become fallen, tough luck. Make alignment actually mean something rather than just a restriction on which classes you get to munchkin together.
-
- Posts: 1589
- Joined: Fri Oct 06, 2017 5:20 am
Re: Smite Neutrals
If there's no alignment shifting going on for evil acts, why bother even being neutral? The people that just don't want to be smited will just be 'good.' All this proposal will encourage is people just picking good now. In most cases nothing stops that.
It will just make the problem worse.
Exactly. Enforce peoples alignments.Manjappa wrote:Yes, this. Paladins shouldn't get to "smite neutral", if anything they should get fallen for trying to smite someone neutral. Instead of doing this as some sort of fix for the alignment cheese, maybe enforce actually playing your alignment. Because if you don't enforce alignment there is also nothing stopping one from just being a good-aligned psychotic babykiller either, so this fixes nothing.BegoneThoth wrote:A better option might just be to bump the evil neutrals down to evil.
Lawful/chaotic is harder to spot, but DMs can shift alignment a few points if they observe good/evil acts being committed. If that changes you from neutral to evil, tough luck. If that causes your Paladin to become fallen, tough luck. Make alignment actually mean something rather than just a restriction on which classes you get to munchkin together.
-
- Contributor
- Posts: 2908
- Joined: Thu Jun 11, 2015 2:31 am
- Location: Dancing on the line between sarcasm and irony
Re: Smite Neutrals
Alignments are cosmical tendencies, and it is up to us to play them to the best of our abilities.
Most of my characters were neutral. Kiravias, Atrilabax, Veritas, all characters that dabbled or did questionable things but without malice, or did things for the greater good with malice, or held malice while X. All these characters had flaws, they had good intentions, they had egoistical intentions, they had resentment and dark thoughts, they had enemies, rivals, beliefs. Were they evil? They could be. Were they good? They could be. In retrospective some of these characters may have done more good than good characters, healers and paladins, but they remained neutral in alignment because they never merited to be more than that.
If you want to enforce alignments, the best you can do is send a report to the DM team about how X character is doing this and that and just... let it be. Maybe they'll get an alignment switch, maybe they won't. One way or another, smite neutral seems like a better solution.
Available races
Spell Changes
Class Mechanics
Command Guide
Take a look before asking your questions!
-
- Posts: 1589
- Joined: Fri Oct 06, 2017 5:20 am
Re: Smite Neutrals
But if you dont' want that enforced, and this change goes in, enjoy the NG murder hobo's then.
If people pick neutral just to avoid smiting (as alleged) then expect people to pick good for the same reason.
And my god did Paladins just get powerful.
-
- Project Lead
- Posts: 1445
- Joined: Fri Sep 12, 2014 2:02 am
Re: Smite Neutrals
CoT doesn't have 'Smite Infidel.' They have Smite Evil.BegoneThoth wrote:goodbye CoT's unique gimmick of 'smite infidel' as that just sort of became everyones thing.
-
- Posts: 1589
- Joined: Fri Oct 06, 2017 5:20 am
Re: Smite Neutrals
Whoops wrong server. Disregard.yellowcateyes wrote:CoT doesn't have 'Smite Infidel.' They have Smite Evil.BegoneThoth wrote:goodbye CoT's unique gimmick of 'smite infidel' as that just sort of became everyones thing.
Edit; I was wrong about many things, ignore my posts.
-
- Posts: 476
- Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2015 11:06 pm
Re: Smite Neutrals
Gee don't paladins already have a Smite Neutral that they can use more often than and for longer time periods than Smite Evil?
Re: Smite Neutrals
>Using may-may arrows on a forumMoreThanThree wrote:>Divine Might
Gee don't paladins already have a Smite Neutral that they can use more often than and for longer time periods than Smite Evil?
>Being generally disrespectful about something you're wrong about to begin with
Gee doesn't smite do (Paladin + CoT level) * Great Smite level to physical damage with an AB increase of CHA modifier vs. evil foes?
Gee doesn't Divine Might only do CHA mod bonus to damage as divine?
Gee doesn't that mean that a Smiter build does actually hundreds of damage, on top of Divine Might?
Gee doesn't that seem like the two feats are completely different?
Gee isn't this mode of posting somewhat demeaning to read and make me come across as rude?
In the future please focus on using a more constructive method to express your thoughts, such as "Paladins get Turn Undead and then can get Divine Might which allows them to still do damage to neutral foes." To which the counter is, simply, "Yes but it isn't remotely near what Smite Evil can do, what's your point?"
"You shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free."
Garrbear wrote:quite bluntly we can't balance the server around people who don't play well
Irongron wrote:My main takeaway from this is that Jack is apparently personable
Re: Smite Neutrals
This is akin to telling a PnP DM they can't tell a Paladin how to play their Lawful Good alignment because they can't understand the whole of that alignment. Yes you can.Iceborn wrote:You cannot enforce alignments because not as players, not as characters can understand exactly the whole of the alignment. You cannot get a real feel of a character and judge their complexity in a single "you are evil", or "you are neutral".
Alignments are cosmical tendencies, and it is up to us to play them to the best of our abilities.
If you want to enforce alignments, the best you can do is send a report to the DM team about how X character is doing this and that and just... let it be. Maybe they'll get an alignment switch, maybe they won't. One way or another, smite neutral seems like a better solution.
"Good" is "I do things that help other people at my own cost."
Evil is "I do things that help me or my desires at the cost of others."
Neutral is "I do nice things. Sometimes. Not really often, usually only when it suits me. I don't really do evil stuff though, isn't my place to take peoples' stuff away or what not."
Lawful is "I abide a code or set of principles because without that I feel lost amidst an ocean of nonsense."
Chaos is "idk fam I do what I want without much concern for a code or what not."
So when you run across Slaver McMurderHobo goes "hey i dont like elfs n i wanna go 2 war with them cus i can and lol slaves" you can go "Hm. This guy doesn't really seem to have a code (chaotic) and is doing stuff for personal gain at the cost of others (evil)."
Maybe I'm not understanding your post or something, but it's well within our rights as players (and our characters' rights) to determine for ourselves if someone is evil or not.
"You shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free."
Garrbear wrote:quite bluntly we can't balance the server around people who don't play well
Irongron wrote:My main takeaway from this is that Jack is apparently personable
-
- Posts: 1589
- Joined: Fri Oct 06, 2017 5:20 am
-
- Posts: 2186
- Joined: Mon Sep 08, 2014 3:40 am
Re: Smite Neutrals
Oskarr of Procampur, Ro Irokon, Nahal Azyen, Nelehein Afsana (of Impiltur), Vencenti Medici, Nizram ali Balazdam, (Roznik) Naethandreil
Re: Smite Neutrals
That being said, edgy paladins who behave like a hammer that sees nails everywhere should probably also be a subject to the aforementioned consequence.
What I'm getting at here is that when a smiter's smite fails, the reasons for it do not always have to be be that "z0mG blatant Evil McEvilpants is a cheesing with a CN alignment to avoid smite again", but there is also the possibility that the paladin actually failed to successfully identify true evil and resorted to violence regardless (in which case, merely not having that excessive DPS kicking in seems a rather mild consequence).
Re: Smite Neutrals
-
- Contributor
- Posts: 2908
- Joined: Thu Jun 11, 2015 2:31 am
- Location: Dancing on the line between sarcasm and irony
Re: Smite Neutrals
Sorry, I meant to say [deleted wall of text].Jack Oat wrote:More stuff.Iceborn wrote:Some stuff
To put it short: in PnP your DM is in front of you the whole time, from start to end. In Arelith, we have months worth of RP under our belt, that no DM wants to spend 2 weeks reviewing to understand why x happened when the alignment sheet says Z instead.
My take is that you should always choose what is closest and be able to reconsider if your character still qualifies for that alignment every now and then. If somebody cheeses it, well, that's just another mechanic for you. We have like 600 millions of those that anybody may cheese at any time.
Available races
Spell Changes
Class Mechanics
Command Guide
Take a look before asking your questions!