Is spellsword damage always bludgeoning?
If so I assume it's safe to say that it doesn't stack other bludgeoning damage (masterly damask or weapon enchantments).
Is this is the case is this an oversight we can expect a change too?
Spellsword INT damage
Moderators: Active DMs, Forum Moderators
-
- Posts: 173
- Joined: Mon Sep 08, 2014 1:52 am
- Location: United Kingdom
-
- Contributor
- Posts: 2930
- Joined: Thu Jun 11, 2015 2:31 am
- Location: Dancing on the line between sarcasm and irony
Re: Spellsword INT damage
Bludgeon damage stacking perfectly and working as intended.
Misc Changes, with the Feats and Skills sublinks.
Available races
Spell Changes
Class Mechanics
Command Guide
Take a look before asking your questions!
Available races
Spell Changes
Class Mechanics
Command Guide
Take a look before asking your questions!
-
- Posts: 173
- Joined: Mon Sep 08, 2014 1:52 am
- Location: United Kingdom
Re: Spellsword INT damage
I was under the impression it doesn't overlap?
If it does then that's great.
Edit: Didn't see the top image somehow... Clearly it works. Thanks Iceborn.
If it does then that's great.
Edit: Didn't see the top image somehow... Clearly it works. Thanks Iceborn.
Re: Spellsword INT damage
For the no overlapping thing, you're thinking about damage bonuses such as the one a raging barbarian gains (piercing damage): they're applied to the weapon and, rather than stack up, only the higher bonus of a specific type applies.
Spellsword INT damage is -not- a temporal weapon buff: it applies directly to your character sheet without modifying the weapon. Seems like that's all the difference it takes to make it work nicely.
Spellsword INT damage is -not- a temporal weapon buff: it applies directly to your character sheet without modifying the weapon. Seems like that's all the difference it takes to make it work nicely.