heavy armor usefulness

You have questions? We may have answers.

Moderators: Active DMs, Forum Moderators

Post Reply
William Steele
Posts: 53
Joined: Mon Sep 08, 2014 10:31 pm

heavy armor usefulness

Post by William Steele » Mon Sep 08, 2014 10:34 pm

With the new fighter update, is there a nod to the utter uselessness of mithril and adamantine armors for fighters?

seems like only paladins will benefit from heavey armor, now. fighters and clerics have magic vestment which supersedes the power of the armor itself. unless i'm mistaken? i understand it's new, and we'll see how it goes, but, i was wondering if it was given the nod of 'yes, that is noted.'

User avatar
Mithreas
Emeritus Admin
Emeritus Admin
Posts: 2555
Joined: Sat Sep 06, 2014 3:09 am

Re: heavy armor usefulness

Post by Mithreas » Mon Sep 08, 2014 10:46 pm

Not yet.

Of course, mithril armor has long been due an overhaul. Adamantine is staying - there are lots and lots of builds that won't take either 15 Cleric or 15 Fighter and can use it. But mithril may get a switch up at some point.
xkcd.com is best viewed with Netscape Navigator 4.0 or below on a Pentium 3±1 emulated in Javascript on an Apple IIGS at a screen resolution of 1024x1.For security reasons, please leave caps lock on while browsing.

William Steele
Posts: 53
Joined: Mon Sep 08, 2014 10:31 pm

Re: heavy armor usefulness

Post by William Steele » Tue Sep 09, 2014 5:32 am

well, i was hoping for "we're going to give mithril 15% immunities and adamantine 20% immunities," but you guys know what you're doing haha.

User avatar
KregorRanger
Posts: 462
Joined: Mon Sep 08, 2014 3:42 am

Re: heavy armor usefulness

Post by KregorRanger » Tue Sep 09, 2014 5:39 am

From the d20 SRD:
Mithral
Mithral is a very rare silvery, glistening metal that is lighter than iron but just as hard. When worked like steel, it becomes a wonderful material from which to create armor and is occasionally used for other items as well. Most mithral armors are one category lighter than normal for purposes of movement and other limitations. Heavy armors are treated as medium, and medium armors are treated as light, but light armors are still treated as light. Spell failure chances for armors and shields made from mithral are decreased by 10%, maximum Dexterity bonus is increased by 2, and armor check penalties are lessened by 3 (to a minimum of 0).

An item made from mithral weighs half as much as the same item made from other metals. In the case of weapons, this lighter weight does not change a weapon’s size category or the ease with which it can be wielded (whether it is light, one-handed, or two-handed).
How to approximate this, without item property fields for changing DEX bonus max, weight category, etc?

The easiest way I could see, would be for the crafting to actually spawn an armor that was in the next weight category, down, and make up the difference in armor modifier with additional enhancement bonus to AC. For example:

Current Mithral Breastplate: Breastplate with +2AC (total armor mod +7), 80% weight (not even close!), and 10% damage immunity (eh).
Reworked Mithral Breastplate: Scale mail with +3AC (total armor mod still +7), 70% weight (which would end up half of the breastplate).
You would gain, without other property mods, the 10% ASF reduction (because scale is 20% vs 30%), Max DEX +4 vs. +3, and -2 armor penalty vs. -5. This all pretty closely approximates all the benefits of mithral, except that it's still considered medium armor.

Current Mithral Scale: Scale with +2AC (total armor mod +6), 80% weight (not even close!), and 10% damage immunity (eh).
Reworked Mithral Scale: Leather armor with +4AC (total armor mod still +6), no weight reduction needed.
You would gain, without other property mods, the 10% ASF reduction (because leather is 10% vs 20%), Max DEX +6 vs. +4, and no armor penalty vs. -2. Weight category is light instead of medium. This approximates the benefits of mithral almost perfectly.

Heavier armors would base off of the breastplate, varying the AC enhancement bonus and weight reduction. +3/60% to equal mithril banded, +4/70% to equate mithril half plate, and (eek!) +5/80% to equate mithril full plate. All would be, as they should be, medium weight category instead of heavy.

Yes, this approach breaks the "Low/Mid-magic" barrier of present Regulith. Yes, it would make the mithril "heavy" armors hella expensive (and they should be). It would also affect some aesthetic in the fact that the torso models wouldn't match up for the type of armor it is.

If +5 for mithril "full plate" is too much armor bonus, then cap mithril at half plate, much like greensteel is capped at a breastplate.

Also, re: Adamantine armor, canonically:
Adamantine
....
Armor made from adamantine grants its wearer damage reduction of 1/- if it’s light armor, 2/- if it’s medium armor, and 3/- if it’s heavy armor.

William Steele
Posts: 53
Joined: Mon Sep 08, 2014 10:31 pm

Re: heavy armor usefulness

Post by William Steele » Tue Sep 09, 2014 6:37 am

am i crazy, or did adamantine use to have an enhancement bonus that worked even in null magic areas?

User avatar
Mayonnaise
Posts: 260
Joined: Mon Sep 08, 2014 1:49 am
Location: Michigan, USA

Re: heavy armor usefulness

Post by Mayonnaise » Tue Sep 09, 2014 10:38 am

There are areas where armor properties don't work? Interesting.

Post Reply