New spell availability.
Moderators: Forum Moderators, Active DMs
New spell availability.
Just a simple question, kind of a request..
But what's the word on how these spells will be available to current characters?
For example a Cleric and Druid should automatically have their spells in their spellbooks, they get all their spells of each level when they level up so that's fine.
A sorcerer need only drop one level and they can shift around their learned spells at will and quite easily.
But Wizards, if they drop a level they can only learn two spells, everything else will be from scrolls. Now the update states that the new spells will be added as scrolls eventually which is fine, but vendors don't sell scrolls over spell level 5 (some 6 I think) so that means we're going to have to rely on new wizards leveling up and giving us scribed scrolls to learn the new spells, that or hope we get them as a drop, which may or may not happen at all.
My main concern about this is that once you hit 30 on a wizard, like I have, it's generally a good path to RP "filling your spellbook", I know that I spent a lot of time and money on filling my spellbook, and my character is a fairly well established wizard on the surface, well known for his time spent as one. It seems kinda weird to have to RP with some fresh blooded wizard to get some spells off them because I neglected to learn them while levelling or while I was pursuing getting all the spells I could to fill my book. RP wise it doesn't make a lot of sense for my character.
So, would it be at all possible to grant any level 30 wizard (or 27/3 of course) that already has/had a "full spellbook" a copy of each of these new spells to add to said book? I'm loving the additions and it's great to see, but it'd also be nice if there were some concessions for the sake of the RP that some of us have had well established for quite some time.
Thank you.
But what's the word on how these spells will be available to current characters?
For example a Cleric and Druid should automatically have their spells in their spellbooks, they get all their spells of each level when they level up so that's fine.
A sorcerer need only drop one level and they can shift around their learned spells at will and quite easily.
But Wizards, if they drop a level they can only learn two spells, everything else will be from scrolls. Now the update states that the new spells will be added as scrolls eventually which is fine, but vendors don't sell scrolls over spell level 5 (some 6 I think) so that means we're going to have to rely on new wizards leveling up and giving us scribed scrolls to learn the new spells, that or hope we get them as a drop, which may or may not happen at all.
My main concern about this is that once you hit 30 on a wizard, like I have, it's generally a good path to RP "filling your spellbook", I know that I spent a lot of time and money on filling my spellbook, and my character is a fairly well established wizard on the surface, well known for his time spent as one. It seems kinda weird to have to RP with some fresh blooded wizard to get some spells off them because I neglected to learn them while levelling or while I was pursuing getting all the spells I could to fill my book. RP wise it doesn't make a lot of sense for my character.
So, would it be at all possible to grant any level 30 wizard (or 27/3 of course) that already has/had a "full spellbook" a copy of each of these new spells to add to said book? I'm loving the additions and it's great to see, but it'd also be nice if there were some concessions for the sake of the RP that some of us have had well established for quite some time.
Thank you.
-
- Project Lead
- Posts: 1631
- Joined: Mon Sep 08, 2014 5:09 pm
- Location: Sweden
Re: New spell availability.
That's the issue of adding new spells and our restrictions on selling only low-mid tier circle spells on NPC merchants. For now you have to rely on new wizards or sorcs scribing these spells for you as I don't think giving these spells for free as a good idea. Though I guess that is to DM discretion or if Irongron has any say in this.Orian_666 wrote: ↑Wed Sep 18, 2019 8:55 pmJust a simple question, kind of a request..
But what's the word on how these spells will be available to current characters?
For example a Cleric and Druid should automatically have their spells in their spellbooks, they get all their spells of each level when they level up so that's fine.
A sorcerer need only drop one level and they can shift around their learned spells at will and quite easily.
But Wizards, if they drop a level they can only learn two spells, everything else will be from scrolls. Now the update states that the new spells will be added as scrolls eventually which is fine, but vendors don't sell scrolls over spell level 5 (some 6 I think) so that means we're going to have to rely on new wizards leveling up and giving us scribed scrolls to learn the new spells, that or hope we get them as a drop, which may or may not happen at all.
My main concern about this is that once you hit 30 on a wizard, like I have, it's generally a good path to RP "filling your spellbook", I know that I spent a lot of time and money on filling my spellbook, and my character is a fairly well established wizard on the surface, well known for his time spent as one. It seems kinda weird to have to RP with some fresh blooded wizard to get some spells off them because I neglected to learn them while levelling or while I was pursuing getting all the spells I could to fill my book. RP wise it doesn't make a lot of sense for my character.
So, would it be at all possible to grant any level 30 wizard (or 27/3 of course) that already has/had a "full spellbook" a copy of each of these new spells to add to said book? I'm loving the additions and it's great to see, but it'd also be nice if there were some concessions for the sake of the RP that some of us have had well established for quite some time.
Thank you.
Re: New spell availability.
It may be a good idea for me to approach it IC then, when they become available that is.
I might get Paddy to ask the new Tower Archmage for the scrolls, for a price i'd imagine =p
Cheers for the swift responses ActionReplay!!
I might get Paddy to ask the new Tower Archmage for the scrolls, for a price i'd imagine =p
Cheers for the swift responses ActionReplay!!
Re: New spell availability.
Just my two cents.
Sometimes, its the completely nobody who invents some new stuff, that the existing professor overlooked entirely.
I know of one such story in real life but can't remember it from the top of my mind.
My advise is; despite playing an already established wizard, allow yourself the moment of having overlooked some new discovery and now have to acquire it from those lesser than you, by third hand if neccessary to avoid losing face.
In the end, it is just a minor, temporary inconvenience.
Sometimes, its the completely nobody who invents some new stuff, that the existing professor overlooked entirely.
I know of one such story in real life but can't remember it from the top of my mind.
My advise is; despite playing an already established wizard, allow yourself the moment of having overlooked some new discovery and now have to acquire it from those lesser than you, by third hand if neccessary to avoid losing face.
In the end, it is just a minor, temporary inconvenience.
-
- Posts: 824
- Joined: Wed Mar 25, 2015 4:44 pm
- Location: Denmark
Re: New spell availability.
Re: New spell availability.
easy.. you drop one level (1xp below level up), wait 0-6min gain the level and gain two spells you want to have, scribe 1 scroll of each spell, then drop 1 xp below level again, repeat too you have all the spells you want to have. then keep the level and learn all the spells from the scrolls you made.
-
- Arelith Silver Supporter
- Posts: 264
- Joined: Thu Apr 05, 2018 8:54 am
- Location: UK
Re: New spell availability.
Isn't that a rules breach?Terenfel wrote: ↑Thu Sep 19, 2019 10:04 ameasy.. you drop one level (1xp below level up), wait 0-6min gain the level and gain two spells you want to have, scribe 1 scroll of each spell, then drop 1 xp below level again, repeat too you have all the spells you want to have. then keep the level and learn all the spells from the scrolls you made.
Characters: Izzy, short for Isabel. Shaena Ash.
Re: New spell availability.
i dont play a wizard.. but seems like the way to fix it.. also seems cheesy yes, but cant seem to find a rule that say you may not do it? (but will now spend some time to look at the wiki for the rules)
Re: New spell availability.
guess you might be right.. going to the wiki list of commands -losexp references to the update where they say you may not exploit this command, not making any examples of what is a exploit.. but they do log it what you do with it.. so until there is a ruling here.. do it at you own risk and i guess a DM will get in touch with you if it is a exploit.
-
- Dungeon Master
- Posts: 6565
- Joined: Sun Jan 18, 2015 5:47 pm
Re: New spell availability.
I will discuss this with the team - but honestly I would see this as a bit of an exploit yeah.
This too shall pass.
(I now have a DM Discord (I hope) It's DM GrumpyCat#7185 but please keep in mind I'm very busy IRL so I can't promise how quick I'll get back to you.)
(I now have a DM Discord (I hope) It's DM GrumpyCat#7185 but please keep in mind I'm very busy IRL so I can't promise how quick I'll get back to you.)
Re: New spell availability.
Also, we are planning on adding scrolls and the like to various merchants and loot tables.
While it's exciting to have the new spells added, please do not delevel to attain the new spells this way.
While it's exciting to have the new spells added, please do not delevel to attain the new spells this way.
Discord Contact : DM Axis#2344"It is evil things we shall be fighting against, brute force, bad faith, injustice, oppression and persecution."
- Minister Neville Chamberlain 1939
-
- Community Manager
- Posts: 3370
- Joined: Sun Sep 07, 2014 6:44 pm
- Location: The Seeliecourt singing with Tinkerbell
Re: New spell availability.
To concur with the above two: If you are a wizard, do not -losexp to get these spells, we will slap you for exploiting. If you already have, consider this a heads up to undo your error.
Please don't feed my sister.
-
- Arelith Silver Supporter
- Posts: 735
- Joined: Mon Sep 08, 2014 2:32 am
Re: New spell availability.
The error can't be undone for those who already have a full spellbook. Upon levelling, if you have spells available, you MUST pick two of them. OK is greyed out otherwise. What is to be done in these cases?
Alia: The uncanny knack of Angela Amana to make the otherwise perpetually well-mannered girl lose her temper and be HORRIBLY ASHAMED afterwards.
Who on the Team to PM and When
Public Tower Discord
Tower Library
Scroll, Wand, & Potion Costs
Who on the Team to PM and When
Public Tower Discord
Tower Library
Scroll, Wand, & Potion Costs
-
- Arelith Silver Supporter
- Posts: 735
- Joined: Mon Sep 08, 2014 2:32 am
Re: New spell availability.
Stay at 29 until you get two scrolls, do not learn the scrolls, then contact the DM team taking those two spells during the levelling process.
Alia: The uncanny knack of Angela Amana to make the otherwise perpetually well-mannered girl lose her temper and be HORRIBLY ASHAMED afterwards.
Who on the Team to PM and When
Public Tower Discord
Tower Library
Scroll, Wand, & Potion Costs
Who on the Team to PM and When
Public Tower Discord
Tower Library
Scroll, Wand, & Potion Costs
-
- Arelith Supporter
- Posts: 2028
- Joined: Thu Sep 11, 2014 4:57 pm
Re: New spell availability.
DM Titania wrote: ↑Thu Sep 19, 2019 6:53 pmTo concur with the above two: If you are a wizard, do not -losexp to get these spells, we will slap you for exploiting. If you already have, consider this a heads up to undo your error.
Triaddraykin is correct, and I also have an epic level wizard elf on a shelf that I may losexp on some day before I roll him - does this means wizards are not allowed to -losexp at all in the wake of the recent update? Why is a level two wizard who delivers a half dozen packages a more viable candidate for a new spell than an epic level one who drops XP and chooses to focus on said new area of study?triaddraykin wrote: ↑Thu Sep 19, 2019 8:34 pmThe error can't be undone for those who already have a full spellbook. Upon levelling, if you have spells available, you MUST pick two of them. OK is greyed out otherwise. What is to be done in these cases?
For clarity: I can easily acknowledge Cheeseball factor in dropping 1 xp below a level and regaining it just for a spell, but I can't see a valid reason that it's any different from a level 28+ character de-leveling to 27 to change/add a second/third class as their needs demand. In both cases you're giving up something you had learned for something else you want to learn. The restriction of spell selection not benefiting seems unique, and does not affect all caster classes equally.
I absolutely agree dropping a level and gaining it to scribe a (stack of) scroll(s), delevel again, and take the other spell is cheating, as you are then not making the trade of "what I chose to learn," and are in fact probably profiting greatly off of it, but a blanket ban off of taking these spells when re-leveling from -losexp without any context seems heavy-handed.
Bane's tyranny is known throughout the continent, and his is the image most seen as the face of evil.
-Faiths and Pantheons (c)2002
-Faiths and Pantheons (c)2002
Re: New spell availability.
Terrible judgement call imo.
I could absolutely understand calling someone out if they did it multiple times to get all of the spells, especially with no RP behind it, but to tell a level 30 wizard;
"Hey, how dare you think you can learn something new on your own without the help of someone else, the very same way you learned most of the other spells you know. You're level 30 didn't you know, you're not allowed to continue to grow, develop, and learn without the aid of others!! Even if you 'roleplay' it out, I mean what do you think this is? An RP server? *Scoffs*"
"Oh, uh.... please ignore that Cleric and Druid that just happened to wake up and know how to cast a shit load of new spells, nothing to see here." -.-
It makes zero sense to not allow it to be done a single time, especially if it's properly RP'd out, and especially considering Sorcerers and Bards can do it, apparently, without any RP at all.
I've been wracking my brain here for the last while and honestly I can't think of a single logical reason to disallow this. I understand that the -losexp command isn't to be exploited, but I don't at all see this as an exploit when it's properly RP'd out, taking time to study some ancient text, document, or rune work. Or travelling somewhere on the mainland to learn a couple new spells and the trip/effort/work left you a bit tired and worn out so you can't scribe scrolls for others for a little while until you regain your energy.
No, instead our characters, wizards that are just as capable of learning something new as the next generation of wizards, have to sit around and wait for them to come along and be all like;
"A new spell I never heard of, how strange, I must have simply missed it during the last few decades where I have literally been at the peak of arcane community on this island, clearly i'm an absolute bloody moron or something....."
I could absolutely understand calling someone out if they did it multiple times to get all of the spells, especially with no RP behind it, but to tell a level 30 wizard;
"Hey, how dare you think you can learn something new on your own without the help of someone else, the very same way you learned most of the other spells you know. You're level 30 didn't you know, you're not allowed to continue to grow, develop, and learn without the aid of others!! Even if you 'roleplay' it out, I mean what do you think this is? An RP server? *Scoffs*"
"Oh, uh.... please ignore that Cleric and Druid that just happened to wake up and know how to cast a shit load of new spells, nothing to see here." -.-
It makes zero sense to not allow it to be done a single time, especially if it's properly RP'd out, and especially considering Sorcerers and Bards can do it, apparently, without any RP at all.
I've been wracking my brain here for the last while and honestly I can't think of a single logical reason to disallow this. I understand that the -losexp command isn't to be exploited, but I don't at all see this as an exploit when it's properly RP'd out, taking time to study some ancient text, document, or rune work. Or travelling somewhere on the mainland to learn a couple new spells and the trip/effort/work left you a bit tired and worn out so you can't scribe scrolls for others for a little while until you regain your energy.
No, instead our characters, wizards that are just as capable of learning something new as the next generation of wizards, have to sit around and wait for them to come along and be all like;
"A new spell I never heard of, how strange, I must have simply missed it during the last few decades where I have literally been at the peak of arcane community on this island, clearly i'm an absolute bloody moron or something....."
-
- Dungeon Master
- Posts: 6565
- Joined: Sun Jan 18, 2015 5:47 pm
Re: New spell availability.
We believe that there is more interesting and genuine rp from new characters taking these spells, and sharing it in a genuine and fun way at early levels than old characters using a work about to having 'known all along.' We want to encourage new characters with fresh outlooks and stories, and to give them something neat.
Whilst this does apply to sorcs and bards too, it is worse with wizards because they can spew out endless scrolls, and we can very much see this as being an ego stroking exercise for those that, frankly, do not need their ego stroked. (No names in mind, this is a generality).
Playing an old character gives certain legacy perks, but it should also have definate drawbacks. This is a drawback.
Whilst this does apply to sorcs and bards too, it is worse with wizards because they can spew out endless scrolls, and we can very much see this as being an ego stroking exercise for those that, frankly, do not need their ego stroked. (No names in mind, this is a generality).
Playing an old character gives certain legacy perks, but it should also have definate drawbacks. This is a drawback.
What you're describing is likely somehing that goes on in Academia all the time. Funnily enough new academics learn and discover and research things old academics do not. LIkewise, a child can be better on a computer than their parent, dispite the parent being senior.No, instead our characters, wizards that are just as capable of learning something new as the next generation of wizards, have to sit around and wait for them to come along and be all like;
"A new spell I never heard of, how strange, I must have simply missed it during the last few decades where I have literally been at the peak of arcane community on this island, clearly i'm an absolute bloody moron or something....."
This too shall pass.
(I now have a DM Discord (I hope) It's DM GrumpyCat#7185 but please keep in mind I'm very busy IRL so I can't promise how quick I'll get back to you.)
(I now have a DM Discord (I hope) It's DM GrumpyCat#7185 but please keep in mind I'm very busy IRL so I can't promise how quick I'll get back to you.)
Re: New spell availability.
I don't disagree that it's good RP for new characters to be a part of it all, i'm not denying that.
And I don't believe anyone said that the older mages should have "known all along", in fact I and others explicitly stated that the RP avenues taken to learn these new spells are entirely based on learning them brand new, new discoveries and the like. Which I feel is just as legitimate RP as a new wizard coming along and learning and sharing them.
You've decided that because it's fun for one "side" that you're going to completely cut off the potential RP (which so far for us involved has been great, a lot of fun, and not at all cheesy) for the other "side", when it should be open to both!!
Your reasoning makes very little sense when you consider that the decision itself stifles and hugely limits potential RP for established characters, this is new for us too and we should be allowed to RP it together instead of having to 100% wait on and rely on newer characters. Why can't my wizard and all his wizard buddies RP these new discoveries, be excited about it all, and work together to learn with each other?
What you're doing is restricting our RP and simply gating the content for the sake of new wizards that become a part of the community and RP within it regardless of whether they're bringing new shiney spells or not.... so i say it again, it is a very poor judgement call on the matter...
And I don't believe anyone said that the older mages should have "known all along", in fact I and others explicitly stated that the RP avenues taken to learn these new spells are entirely based on learning them brand new, new discoveries and the like. Which I feel is just as legitimate RP as a new wizard coming along and learning and sharing them.
You've decided that because it's fun for one "side" that you're going to completely cut off the potential RP (which so far for us involved has been great, a lot of fun, and not at all cheesy) for the other "side", when it should be open to both!!
Your reasoning makes very little sense when you consider that the decision itself stifles and hugely limits potential RP for established characters, this is new for us too and we should be allowed to RP it together instead of having to 100% wait on and rely on newer characters. Why can't my wizard and all his wizard buddies RP these new discoveries, be excited about it all, and work together to learn with each other?
What you're doing is restricting our RP and simply gating the content for the sake of new wizards that become a part of the community and RP within it regardless of whether they're bringing new shiney spells or not.... so i say it again, it is a very poor judgement call on the matter...
Re: New spell availability.
And what you're doing is restricting it to that outcome instead of allowing it to happen naturally. Whether the source is a new academic or an old one shouldn't matter, both should be allowed the freedom to continue to learn and grow, from each other or not....DM GrumpyCat wrote: ↑Thu Sep 19, 2019 10:27 pmWhat you're describing is likely somehing that goes on in Academia all the time. Funnily enough new academics learn and discover and research things old academics do not. LIkewise, a child can be better on a computer than their parent, dispite the parent being senior.No, instead our characters, wizards that are just as capable of learning something new as the next generation of wizards, have to sit around and wait for them to come along and be all like;
"A new spell I never heard of, how strange, I must have simply missed it during the last few decades where I have literally been at the peak of arcane community on this island, clearly i'm an absolute bloody moron or something....."
-
- Dungeon Master
- Posts: 6565
- Joined: Sun Jan 18, 2015 5:47 pm
Re: New spell availability.
Why can't you rp the discoveries with new characters?
They don't smell, you know.
Let them have their time in the sun.
They don't smell, you know.
Let them have their time in the sun.
This too shall pass.
(I now have a DM Discord (I hope) It's DM GrumpyCat#7185 but please keep in mind I'm very busy IRL so I can't promise how quick I'll get back to you.)
(I now have a DM Discord (I hope) It's DM GrumpyCat#7185 but please keep in mind I'm very busy IRL so I can't promise how quick I'll get back to you.)
Re: New spell availability.
Why can't we have the freedom and agency to do it with or without them, or both?
I'm more than happy to RP it with new wizards, already i've met a few still levelling in game and have learned some from them, and them some from me. I'd also like the ability to learn it with my older buddies too on top of that without the absolute reliance on the new blood.
Once more for the people in the back, poor judgement call...
I'm more than happy to RP it with new wizards, already i've met a few still levelling in game and have learned some from them, and them some from me. I'd also like the ability to learn it with my older buddies too on top of that without the absolute reliance on the new blood.
Once more for the people in the back, poor judgement call...
-
- Community Manager
- Posts: 3370
- Joined: Sun Sep 07, 2014 6:44 pm
- Location: The Seeliecourt singing with Tinkerbell
Re: New spell availability.
Bluntly? Because we said no. Your methods will remain:Orian_666 wrote: ↑Thu Sep 19, 2019 10:44 pmWhy can't we have the freedom and agency to do it with or without them, or both?
I'm more than happy to RP it with new wizards, already i've met a few still levelling in game and have learned some from them, and them some from me. I'd also like the ability to learn it with my older buddies too on top of that without the absolute reliance on the new blood.
Once more for the people in the back, poor judgement call...
Getting the scroll from another who has learned it, likely a younger magi.
Waiting until they get into shops.
Any DM Quest Reward.
Be patient, and one of the above will happen.
Your last line is very impolite, you're welcome to have your own opinion and state so once, but there is no need to be rude either.
Please don't feed my sister.
Re: New spell availability.
I'm sorry if my last line was rude, I was mostly just trying to be funny to help somewhat alleviate my frustration over this..
But so be it, if the reason is simply because you said so then so be it. Damned be logic, sense, and fun.
But so be it, if the reason is simply because you said so then so be it. Damned be logic, sense, and fun.
-
- Posts: 719
- Joined: Sat Jan 20, 2018 7:48 pm
Re: New spell availability.
People?
You're playing wizards. Make friends with an up and coming wizard who *does* learn it, and boom. Into the book it goes.
This is a ROLEPLAYING MULTIPLAYER server. Go forth and roleplay multiplayerally. You are not, and should not be, the Great Knower and Doer of all, all on your own, regardless of your character's focus or the amount of time they've lingered.
The amount of sheer entitlement here is seriously offputting, and really, *really* needs to be addressed. It's becoming a habit on these forums that I, for one, am very tired of, speaking only for myself and that we, the team, are very tired of, speaking as the Head DM.
If our rulings, and those of the admin team, are not to your pleasure, I always have a list of servers who would love to have players which might be more to your liking.
You're playing wizards. Make friends with an up and coming wizard who *does* learn it, and boom. Into the book it goes.
This is a ROLEPLAYING MULTIPLAYER server. Go forth and roleplay multiplayerally. You are not, and should not be, the Great Knower and Doer of all, all on your own, regardless of your character's focus or the amount of time they've lingered.
The amount of sheer entitlement here is seriously offputting, and really, *really* needs to be addressed. It's becoming a habit on these forums that I, for one, am very tired of, speaking only for myself and that we, the team, are very tired of, speaking as the Head DM.
If our rulings, and those of the admin team, are not to your pleasure, I always have a list of servers who would love to have players which might be more to your liking.
What is woven will be.