Advantage of going straight spellsword?

You have questions? We may have answers.

Moderators: Active DMs, Forum Moderators

Post Reply
Wintersoul
Posts: 9
Joined: Mon Jul 10, 2017 11:29 pm

Advantage of going straight spellsword?

Post by Wintersoul » Sat Mar 03, 2018 12:24 am

What are the advantages of going straight class for spellsword?
What dip class for grandfathered ss is best ?

Wintersoul
Posts: 9
Joined: Mon Jul 10, 2017 11:29 pm

Re: Advantage of going straight spellsword?

Post by Wintersoul » Sat Mar 03, 2018 12:24 am

Thank you for all your time and effort.

TimeAdept
Posts: 1336
Joined: Sun Aug 06, 2017 7:02 am

Re: Advantage of going straight spellsword?

Post by TimeAdept » Sat Mar 03, 2018 1:01 am

For a legacy spellsword, 23 spellsword 4 fighter 3 rogue is best, IMO.

Kirito
Posts: 646
Joined: Tue May 16, 2017 8:22 pm

Re: Advantage of going straight spellsword?

Post by Kirito » Sat Mar 03, 2018 2:05 am

at the moment, no advantage of going pure. eventually thwre will be a level 28 cookie when I think of one

discipline bonus will end up being tied to being pure

User avatar
One Two Three Five
Posts: 1139
Joined: Sat Mar 18, 2017 7:09 am

Re: Advantage of going straight spellsword?

Post by One Two Three Five » Sat Mar 03, 2018 3:50 am

TimeAdept wrote:For a legacy spellsword, 23 spellsword 4 fighter 3 rogue is best, IMO.
Honestly, on a legacy 4 APR-without-fighter spellsword? I'd consider 26-27 spellsword/3-4 bard. One of the classes biggest weaknesses is getting dispelled after all. You lose 3 feats (and I GUESS some damage but I don't think most people are running with EWS on them these days anyway), but gain one in epic.

Edit: Of course, by the time you're hype for that disc/tumble dump kirito might've given them their backlash wave capstone
The devil does not need any more advocates
Clerics are just socially acceptable warlocks.

User avatar
Hunter548
Posts: 1869
Joined: Mon Sep 08, 2014 5:40 am

Re: Advantage of going straight spellsword?

Post by Hunter548 » Sat Mar 03, 2018 4:05 am

The big reason that you run 27/3 on a legacy spellsword is imbue DCs. It takes the imbues from DC 37 for a 23 wizard spellsword, to 41 -- Which takes them from "Some people will reliably fail them" to "Most people will reliably fail them." This is pretty valuable when you're relying on imbues to carry you in hard fights.
UilliamNebel wrote:
Wed Feb 12, 2020 10:24 pm
You're right. Participating in the forums was a mistake. Won't do this again.
Anime Sword Fighter wrote: I have seen far too many miniskirt anime slave girls.

User avatar
Maladus
Posts: 811
Joined: Sun Oct 18, 2015 4:43 am

Re: Advantage of going straight spellsword?

Post by Maladus » Sat Mar 03, 2018 9:19 am

One Two Three Five wrote:
TimeAdept wrote:For a legacy spellsword, 23 spellsword 4 fighter 3 rogue is best, IMO.
Honestly, on a legacy 4 APR-without-fighter spellsword? I'd consider 26-27 spellsword/3-4 bard. One of the classes biggest weaknesses is getting dispelled after all. You lose 3 feats (and I GUESS some damage but I don't think most people are running with EWS on them these days anyway), but gain one in epic.

Edit: Of course, by the time you're hype for that disc/tumble dump kirito might've given them their backlash wave capstone
Most people aren’t running EWS on them anymore because most builds won’t take a fighter level in epics after the BAB change.

Post Reply